CompositesWorld
Issue link: https://cw.epubxp.com/i/830100
JUNE 2017 8 CompositesWorld PERSPECTIVES & PROVOCATIONS » Routinely, a television show or magazine will highlight what happened to celebrities from the past — musicians, child tele- vision stars, one-hit wonders, etc. ese segments, frequently titled, "Where Are ey Now?," often find these oldtimers living well, but away from the limelight, without the trappings of fame or fan clubs. Doubtless, a few that seemed destined for long-term success found their careers diverted or simply interrupted. We have some analogues in the composites world. A technology comes along that seems to set the world on fire, or shows incred- ible promise, only to stagnate or ebb, never achieving the "hockey stick" shaped forecasts provided by early entrants and the invest- ment community. Although that list is long, I looked back over the past 10-15 years and found a few worth mentioning. e first is the proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, which generates power from the simple mating of hydrogen and oxygen, producing water as a byproduct. PEMs were heavily promoted as a solution to high gasoline prices in the late 1990s. Shares of the leading players, Ballard Power Systems and Plug Power, soared on the promise of millions of cars and homes running on cheap, clean hydrogen power. For compos- ites, the opportunity was certainly attractive — PEM cells made use of molded, conductive bi-polar plates, carbon fiber membranes and high-pressure, lightweight compressed hydrogen tanks wound with high-strength carbon fiber. Honda, Mercedes, GM and other OEMs fielded test fleets. Suppliers developed materials to serve what was surely enormous growth potential. Ultimately, excite- ment waned, due to poor cold weather performance, cost issues — especially with pollutant-sensitive, expensive platinum catalysts — and the lack of a refueling infrastructure for gaseous hydrogen. So where are they now? Although some hurdles have been cleared, others remain. Ballard and Plug Power are still alive, but focused on fleet vehicles and clean power for industrial and IT firms, having scaled down growth expectations. Toyota, BMW and other OEMs still dabble with PEMs, but only in niche markets. Around 2000, a second example was TWINTEX, a Saint-Gobain Vetrotex commingled tow, produced by combining polypro- pylene (or PET) fibers in line with the drawing of the glass fibers. is eliminated the need for the secondary process usually asso- ciated with commingling, therefore offering a lower price point. Woven into wide, long rolls, TWINTEX fabrics and tows saw exten- sive end-use product development in automotive components, impact-resistant watercraft, pallets and shipping containers, among others. e performance/price ratio boded well for exceptional market growth. But despite attractive material pricing, processing of TWINTEX was not always easy nor rapid. Where is TWINTEX now? In 2007, Saint-Gobain's reinforcements business was acquired by Owens Corning, and the technology portfolio was subsequently sold to Fiber Glass Industries in 2012. After FGI's operations ceased in 2014, production of TWINTEX also ceased and FGI's assets were sold to SAERTEX. Commingled fibers produced by conventional means are today supplied by Concordia Fibers, Innegra, Coats Group, and Schappe Techniques, albeit without the large-volume expectations of TWINTEX. I might get some pushback on this one, but a third technology with unrealized potential are carbon-based nanomaterials. In the mid-2000s, carbon nanotubes were extensively promoted as the next transformational material for composites. e space attracted researchers, industrial entrants (existing and startup) and wide media coverage. A broad range of materials, including vapor-grown nanofibers, Buckminsterfullerenes ("buckyballs"), single-walled nanotubes (SWNT) and multi-walled nanotubes (MWNT) were targeted as additives to matrix resins to enhance impact, thermal, electrical and other performance characteristics. And SWNTs and MWNTs could be added to the surface of conventional carbon fibers to leverage fiber-to-resin adhesion, enhancing compression or shear strength. Standing in the way of that explosion of growth were issues with poor dispersion in the matrix, commercial scalability and cost. So where is carbon nanotechnology now? Small quantities of carbon nanotubes/nanofibers are produced and sold into niche applications, largely for sporting goods. But clumping, difficulty with volume production and high prices have quelled the fervor in most markets. Recent efforts are focused on graphene, in platelet and sheet form, with electronics the most promising future market. Innovation is the lifeblood of any industry, and composites are no exception. ese examples and others like them, though legitimately promising, were hurt by unreasonably elevated expectations. It's also possible that inventions like fuel cells arrive before the market is ready to adopt them, but might ultimately succeed. at has me wondering what are today's "next big things" that we will be looking back on and wondering "where are they now?" in 2030? Where are they now? Dale Brosius is the chief commercialization officer for the Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI, Knoxville, TN, US), a US Department of Energy (DoE)- sponsored public/private partnership targeting high-volume applications of composites in energy-related industries. He is also head of his own consulting company and his career has included positions at US-based firms Dow Chemical Co. (Midland, MI), Fiberite (Tempe, AZ) and successor Cytec Industries Inc. (Woodland Park, NJ), and Bankstown Airport, NSW, Australia-based Quickstep Holdings. He also served as chair of the Society of Plastics Engineers Composites and Thermoset Divisions. Brosius has a BS in chemical engineering from Texas A&M; University and an MBA. Promising technologies of yesteryear: Where are they now? What can be learned from unfulfilled promises?