CompositesWorld

JUL 2015

CompositesWorld

Issue link: https://cw.epubxp.com/i/532917

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 25 of 51

JULY 2015 24 CompositesWorld FEATURE / MOLDMAKING TECHNOLOGY Point, CA, US) and BJB TC-1614 from BJB Enterprises Inc. (Tustin, CA, US), which are easier to apply on more complex tool shapes. "In general," adds Schniepp, "the best sealer method is geometry-dependent, and our plan is to provide guidance in our upcoming design guide." Te guide is a work in progress, led by Dahl, who with Schniepp works within the Vertical Solu- tions business unit at Stratasys, which provides actual applica- tion support for customers. (Stratasys also fulflls customer tool orders through its Stratasys Direct Manufacturing service bureau.) SIDE STORY Although they have been overshadowed by aerospace applications, 3D-printed tools also are fnding a place in automotive processing. One example is the composite technical center Plateau Technique Compositic (Ploemeur, France), afliated with the Université de Bretagné-Sud, in Ploemeur. Compositic recently displayed a large, 3D-printed composite layup tool at the JEC Europe 2015 event in Paris. Yves Grohens, a professor at the Université, says the tool was the result of research that combined additive manufacturing (AM) with robotic automated fber placement (AFP) and other processing technologies, with the aim to create parts as rapidly as possible. "The concept is to compress the entire part design/tool production/robotic programming and part layup time. We are currently in discussions with several automotive OEMs about this innovative use of 3D printing." Grohens explains that his group worked with automaker PSA Peugeot Citroën (Paris, France) on a model 208 demonstrator car roof part, in partnership with robotic system supplier Coriolis Composites Technologies (Queven, France) and SMM (Le Hezo, France), which manufactured the tool via AM. "The idea was to start from the virtual part in CAD, in the form of an .stl, .igs or other fle format that is compatible with both a 3D printing machine and automated tape placement programming." The tool's design and shape were developed from the part's CAD fle and its print was begun by SMM, while Coriolis engineers simultaneously developed the optimum part layup and AFP machine path programming. The tool was printed on SMM's large Fortus 900 FDM machine, supplied by AM equipment manufacturer Stratasys (Eden Prairie, MN, US), with approximately 1m 3 of useful build volume. Total build time was about 100 hours. Stratasys provided polycarbonate powder for the print build, without fber reinforce- ment, but Grohens says, "We achieved sufcient stifness and thermal stability with the polycarbonate for this demonstration tool but, in reality, it would be made with polyetherimide [PEI] Ultem material in production, to enable a higher cure temperature of 180°C and higher pressure. We limited the actual cure temperature of this demo tool to 140°C." Tool weight, when complete, was 14 kg. No mold treatment of any kind was undertaken after the print, says Grohens. Immediately after the mold was completed, it was placed under the Coriolis robotic head to begin the part layup, using 6.5 mm wide carbon/epoxy prepreg tapes. Grohens says that the part layup process, which was completed in a day, was successful the frst time, because tool build, part design and robotic processing were developed simultane- ously, within the same digital space. He adds, "If we had proceeded with classical mold machining and a metallic tool, requiring test articles to ensure correct layup, this process would have taken at least two months to reach that perfect state." Although the untreated mold caused no problem for the part layup and cure, he does add, "The tool surface is a little bit rough, so on subsequent tools, we treat the surface with an epoxy coating that reduces the roughness and provides a better part surface fnish." Compositic is pursuing similar projects with partners, including Airbus, for 3D-printed tool applications. Additive manufacturing in automotive applications bagging, which completely encloses the part and the tool, negating the efects of potential porosity. Schniepp also recommends the use of a good sealer, and Stratasys is working with Airtech International Inc. (Huntington Beach, CA, US), investigating ToolTec CS5, a Boeing-approved contact flm material, and Toolwright-5 adhesive-backed flm, both of which reportedly work well on relatively fat tools to eliminate porosity. Te company also is looking at two-part liquid epoxy sealers, including Hysol EA-9394 from Henkel Corp. (Bay Developmental tooling This polycarbonate layup tool, used to produce a carbon fber composite auto roof, was additively manufactured by SMM (Le Hezo, France) using the machine behind the tool in the top photo, in partnership with a French group that included Plateau Technique Compositic (Ploemeur, France) and Coriolis Composites Technologies (Queven, France). The tool is shown in the bottom photo during layup with a Coriolis robotic tape layup head. Source (both photos) | Plateau Technique Compositic

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of CompositesWorld - JUL 2015